NJ Strong Weather Forum


Join the forum, it's quick and easy

NJ Strong Weather Forum
NJ Strong Weather Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Long Range Thread 9.0

+51
Sparky Sparticles
track17
Grselig
snowday111
2004blackwrx
Joe Snow
GreyBeard
devsman
Mathgod55
deadrabbit79
jimv45
Taffy
Biggin23
crippo84
SNOW MAN
lglickman1
Dtone
Artechmetals
Dunnzoo
Vinnydula
Bkdude
SoulSingMG
oldtimer
Quietace
billg315
Math23x7
snow247
jake732
rb924119
Snowfall
Abba701
nutleyblizzard
Radz
RJB8525
justin92
chief7
hyde345
weatherwatchermom
CPcantmeasuresnow
frank 638
HectorO
Snow88
jmanley32
sroc4
skinsfan1177
algae888
amugs
docstox12
Frank_Wx
NjWeatherGuy
dsix85
55 posters

Page 17 of 40 Previous  1 ... 10 ... 16, 17, 18 ... 28 ... 40  Next

Go down

Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 Empty Re: Long Range Thread 9.0

Post by Frank_Wx Thu Jan 14, 2016 3:43 pm

The EPS look nothing like the OP.

I think we have ourselves a pretty good threat here. I will remain skeptical for the next 3 days because I do not trust the Pacific. It has screwed us too many times this season. We'll see....

Frank_Wx
Godzilla Seeker
Godzilla Seeker

Posts : 21325
Join date : 2013-01-05

http://njstrongweather.blogspot.com/

Back to top Go down

Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 Empty Re: Long Range Thread 9.0

Post by jmanley32 Thu Jan 14, 2016 3:45 pm

Frank_Wx wrote:The EPS look nothing like the OP.

I think we have ourselves a pretty good threat here. I will remain skeptical for the next 3 days because I do not trust the Pacific. It has screwed us too many times this season. We'll see....

Yes I think so too but not getting hyped just showing the maps I am seeing, after so many letdowns already I won't be terribly upset if this doesn't play out but I have more interest in this one than any other purely because all 3 models have a signal at this time, if it was just the gfs or just the cmc, wouldn't pay it any mind.  Can't wait to see whats going on in 3 days.  We need to get these two pesky letdowns out of here. You mean the EPS look better than OP right? And why the slower progression, its showing over the weekend rather than Fri like GFS and somewhat the CMC (though CMC doesn't really have a coastal).

jmanley32
Senior Enthusiast
Senior Enthusiast

Posts : 20647
Join date : 2013-12-12

Back to top Go down

Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 Empty Re: Long Range Thread 9.0

Post by sroc4 Thu Jan 14, 2016 5:08 pm

Jman.  The Euro Op verbatim closes off the southern vort around texas.  It completely closes off creating an upper level low (ULL) independant from the main flow so literally the ULL drifts east slowly over time.  Hr 240 you can see it is just sitting on the SE coast.  There really doesnt look like there is much of a mechanism to draw the ULL up the coast, so my guess would be that most if not all that energy would be bumped off the coast OTS, because the strong Pac jet crashing the west coast keeps everything moving along if we saw beyond 240hrs .  Verbatim of course.  EPS shows a different picture however.  I WILL not get hyped nor will I HYpe any storm until its under 120hrs.  
Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 Ecmwf_39

_________________
"In weather and in life, there's no winning and losing; there's only winning and learning."
WINTER 2012/2013 TOTALS 43.65"WINTER 2017/2018 TOTALS 62.85" WINTER 2022/2023 TOTALS 4.9"      
WINTER 2013/2014 TOTALS 64.85"WINTER 2018/2019 TOTALS 14.25" WINTER 2023/2024 TOTALS 13.1"
WINTER 2014/2015 TOTALS 71.20"WINTER 2019/2020 TOTALS 6.35"   WINTER 2024/2025 TOTALS 0.00
WINTER 2015/2016 TOTALS 35.00"WINTER 2020/2021 TOTALS 37.75"
WINTER 2016/2017 TOTALS 42.25"WINTER 2021/2022 TOTALS 31.65" 
sroc4
sroc4
Admin
Admin

Posts : 8458
Reputation : 302
Join date : 2013-01-07
Location : Wading River, LI

Back to top Go down

Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 Empty Re: Long Range Thread 9.0

Post by Frank_Wx Thu Jan 14, 2016 6:00 pm

It's pretty much thread the needle as it gets. The ridge is rolling east so you have to hope a phase / closed H5 occurs before it's east of the Rockies. We'll have the cold since Mondays systems will leave behind an arctic air mass. Plus there may be a nicely positioned HP. I wish the PAC looked better. Expect models to change drastically run to run. 

Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 569828657dc98_January14201655703PMEST.thumb.png.d17bd4f5e64144a21b1622d3b40b64d8

_________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

CLICK HERE to view NJ Strong Snowstorm Classifications
Frank_Wx
Frank_Wx
Godzilla Seeker
Godzilla Seeker

Posts : 21325
Reputation : 328
Join date : 2013-01-05
Age : 32
Location : Jersey City, NJ

http://njstrongweather.blogspot.com/

Back to top Go down

Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 Empty Re: Long Range Thread 9.0

Post by NjWeatherGuy Thu Jan 14, 2016 9:27 pm

Frank_Wx wrote:It's pretty much thread the needle as it gets. The ridge is rolling east so you have to hope a phase / closed H5 occurs before it's east of the Rockies. We'll have the cold since Mondays systems will leave behind an arctic air mass. Plus there may be a nicely positioned HP. I wish the PAC looked better. Expect models to change drastically run to run. 

Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 569828657dc98_January14201655703PMEST.thumb.png.d17bd4f5e64144a21b1622d3b40b64d8

Suppression could be a problem, ala 18z GFS, or the vort could close off or phase too early and cut again and we rain. Volataile situation and with the way this year is going ill try to pay it no mind until its more in range and we have a clearer picture and other mess of energies are out of the way first.
NjWeatherGuy
NjWeatherGuy
Advanced Forecaster
Advanced Forecaster

Posts : 4100
Reputation : 28
Join date : 2013-01-06
Location : Belle Mead, NJ

Back to top Go down

Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 Empty Re: Long Range Thread 9.0

Post by NjWeatherGuy Thu Jan 14, 2016 9:30 pm

But as of right now, I have to say like the central US HP setup "bananing" over SE Canada, classic setup and will provide cold air, but it needs to hold, unlike this disaster coming tomorrow night, thanks to a primary, bad modeling and no high pressure, terrible setup, like a spring or fall storm.
NjWeatherGuy
NjWeatherGuy
Advanced Forecaster
Advanced Forecaster

Posts : 4100
Reputation : 28
Join date : 2013-01-06
Location : Belle Mead, NJ

Back to top Go down

Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 Empty Re: Long Range Thread 9.0

Post by skinsfan1177 Thu Jan 14, 2016 9:55 pm

So I know some on here think February we may lock into a better pattern. Their is Alot of chatter that weeklies for first half of Feb. Aren't that great and if that is true that doesn't leave us much time.
skinsfan1177
skinsfan1177
Senior Enthusiast
Senior Enthusiast

Posts : 4485
Reputation : 35
Join date : 2013-01-07
Age : 47
Location : Point Pleasant Boro

Back to top Go down

Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 Empty Re: Long Range Thread 9.0

Post by sroc4 Thu Jan 14, 2016 10:13 pm

skinsfan1177 wrote:So I know some on here think February we may lock into a better pattern. Their is Alot of chatter that weeklies for first half of Feb. Aren't that great and if that is true that doesn't leave us much time.

The euro weeklies for week 3-4 look just as bad as the week 3-4 looked back on Dec 24th. Week 3-4 are this week and next and it looks to be the coldest so far this winter whereas back on the 24th they looked horribly warm for these same two week. Point being ehh. Don't bother with the weeklies.

_________________
"In weather and in life, there's no winning and losing; there's only winning and learning."
WINTER 2012/2013 TOTALS 43.65"WINTER 2017/2018 TOTALS 62.85" WINTER 2022/2023 TOTALS 4.9"      
WINTER 2013/2014 TOTALS 64.85"WINTER 2018/2019 TOTALS 14.25" WINTER 2023/2024 TOTALS 13.1"
WINTER 2014/2015 TOTALS 71.20"WINTER 2019/2020 TOTALS 6.35"   WINTER 2024/2025 TOTALS 0.00
WINTER 2015/2016 TOTALS 35.00"WINTER 2020/2021 TOTALS 37.75"
WINTER 2016/2017 TOTALS 42.25"WINTER 2021/2022 TOTALS 31.65" 
sroc4
sroc4
Admin
Admin

Posts : 8458
Reputation : 302
Join date : 2013-01-07
Location : Wading River, LI

Back to top Go down

Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 Empty Re: Long Range Thread 9.0

Post by billg315 Thu Jan 14, 2016 10:18 pm

I agree with sroc. That far off you need to look at overall patterns and trends leading up to the time frame rather than specific projections. Even then nothing is set in stone.
billg315
billg315
Advanced Forecaster - Mod
Advanced Forecaster - Mod

Posts : 4564
Reputation : 185
Join date : 2015-01-24
Age : 50
Location : Flemington, NJ

Back to top Go down

Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 Empty Re: Long Range Thread 9.0

Post by Frank_Wx Thu Jan 14, 2016 11:34 pm

Here's the deal with next Fridays storm. The 00z GFS tonight focused on a different piece of energy that actually sped up the timing of the storm by almost 48 hours. We do NOT want this. There is too much confluence over the northeast still so the upper energy would get sheared out. It's best if we try and get this storm from the second wave, or trailing energy. Heights over the east would be higher and there's better phasing opportunities

_________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

CLICK HERE to view NJ Strong Snowstorm Classifications
Frank_Wx
Frank_Wx
Godzilla Seeker
Godzilla Seeker

Posts : 21325
Reputation : 328
Join date : 2013-01-05
Age : 32
Location : Jersey City, NJ

http://njstrongweather.blogspot.com/

Back to top Go down

Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 Empty Re: Long Range Thread 9.0

Post by Frank_Wx Thu Jan 14, 2016 11:35 pm

The 00z GGEM and GFS tonight look drastically different for this reason.

_________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

CLICK HERE to view NJ Strong Snowstorm Classifications
Frank_Wx
Frank_Wx
Godzilla Seeker
Godzilla Seeker

Posts : 21325
Reputation : 328
Join date : 2013-01-05
Age : 32
Location : Jersey City, NJ

http://njstrongweather.blogspot.com/

Back to top Go down

Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 Empty Re: Long Range Thread 9.0

Post by Artechmetals Thu Jan 14, 2016 11:55 pm

Frank just for reference in the last 20 yrs do you know if there was any yr where there was under 10 inches for the season
Artechmetals
Artechmetals
Pro Enthusiast
Pro Enthusiast

Posts : 571
Reputation : 3
Join date : 2014-01-01
Age : 57
Location : Wayne , NJ

Back to top Go down

Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 Empty Re: Long Range Thread 9.0

Post by Math23x7 Fri Jan 15, 2016 12:24 am

Artechmetals wrote:Frank just for reference in the last 20 yrs do you know if there was any yr where there was under 10 inches for the season

1997-98: 5.5" (5.0" came on March 22nd)
2001-02: 3.5" (3.0" came on January 19th)
2011-12: 7.4" (2.9" came on October 29th)

Math23x7
Wx Statistician Guru
Wx Statistician Guru

Posts : 2382
Reputation : 68
Join date : 2013-01-08

Back to top Go down

Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 Empty Re: Long Range Thread 9.0

Post by Artechmetals Fri Jan 15, 2016 12:29 am

Wow thanks math hope we don't get one if those yrs
Artechmetals
Artechmetals
Pro Enthusiast
Pro Enthusiast

Posts : 571
Reputation : 3
Join date : 2014-01-01
Age : 57
Location : Wayne , NJ

Back to top Go down

Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 Empty Re: Long Range Thread 9.0

Post by justin92 Fri Jan 15, 2016 12:31 am

the CMC has the next wkend storm still

justin92

Posts : 16
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2016-01-01

Back to top Go down

Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 Empty Re: Long Range Thread 9.0

Post by weatherwatchermom Fri Jan 15, 2016 7:42 am

Frank_Wx wrote:The 00z GGEM and GFS tonight look drastically different for this reason.

I am guessing not for the better?!
weatherwatchermom
weatherwatchermom
Senior Enthusiast
Senior Enthusiast

Posts : 3895
Reputation : 78
Join date : 2014-11-25
Location : Hazlet Township, NJ

Back to top Go down

Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 Empty Re: Long Range Thread 9.0

Post by Guest Fri Jan 15, 2016 7:55 am

weatherwatchermom wrote:
Frank_Wx wrote:The 00z GGEM and GFS tonight look drastically different for this reason.

I am guessing not for the better?!

When has any model change this year been for the better? Mad Mad

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 Empty Re: Long Range Thread 9.0

Post by skinsfan1177 Fri Jan 15, 2016 8:08 am

Can someone explain to what it means for the Pac to cooperate
skinsfan1177
skinsfan1177
Senior Enthusiast
Senior Enthusiast

Posts : 4485
Reputation : 35
Join date : 2013-01-07
Age : 47
Location : Point Pleasant Boro

Back to top Go down

Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 Empty Re: Long Range Thread 9.0

Post by Guest Fri Jan 15, 2016 8:49 am

skinsfan1177 wrote:Can someone explain to what it means for the Pac to cooperate

The Pacific ridge, You want it extending up into western Canada so the cold air and energy drops southeastwards into our area. With El Nino the warm air crashes into the west coast bringing tons of moisture into California and flattening the ridge.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 Empty Re: Long Range Thread 9.0

Post by sroc4 Fri Jan 15, 2016 8:53 am

skinsfan1177 wrote:Can someone explain to what it means for the Pac to cooperate

In general that's a pretty complex question. In a nutshell we have had convection in and around the dateline for some time. We have had that convection focused to that area pretty much the entire season so far. However we have only seen transient influences on the sub Aleutian trough. Instead of that area locking in that trough south of the Aleutian Islands which in turn would promote a amplified strong ridge complex along the west coast of North America we have had other influences specifically the convection in the Indian Ocean influencing the polar jet more strongly, and more consistently. The result of this influence has been more of a progressive pacific jet across the entire northern third of the pacific. The result of this progressive and fairly strong flow across the Pacific is to send piece after piece of 500 mb energy into our West Coast deamplifying the ridging in that area. So we can never really get, to this point, northern energy to phase with Southern energy because there's no amplification of that ridging. Unfortunately it looks like the current pulse of energy and convection in the Indian Ocean seems to become becoming stronger. We will have to see if this area relaxes some but if it doesn't and the MJ oh makes it into faces three and specially for we may need that stratospheric warming event as an absolute key to save our winter.

That's my take simply stated. Maybe Frank or others could comment.

_________________
"In weather and in life, there's no winning and losing; there's only winning and learning."
WINTER 2012/2013 TOTALS 43.65"WINTER 2017/2018 TOTALS 62.85" WINTER 2022/2023 TOTALS 4.9"      
WINTER 2013/2014 TOTALS 64.85"WINTER 2018/2019 TOTALS 14.25" WINTER 2023/2024 TOTALS 13.1"
WINTER 2014/2015 TOTALS 71.20"WINTER 2019/2020 TOTALS 6.35"   WINTER 2024/2025 TOTALS 0.00
WINTER 2015/2016 TOTALS 35.00"WINTER 2020/2021 TOTALS 37.75"
WINTER 2016/2017 TOTALS 42.25"WINTER 2021/2022 TOTALS 31.65" 
sroc4
sroc4
Admin
Admin

Posts : 8458
Reputation : 302
Join date : 2013-01-07
Location : Wading River, LI

Back to top Go down

Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 Empty Re: Long Range Thread 9.0

Post by sroc4 Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:30 am

sroc4 wrote:
skinsfan1177 wrote:Can someone explain to what it means for the Pac to cooperate

In general that's a pretty complex question. In a nutshell we have  had convection in and around the dateline for some time.  We have had that convection focused to that area pretty much the entire season so far. However  we have only seen transient influences on the sub Aleutian trough. Instead of that area locking in that trough south of the Aleutian Islands which in turn would promote a amplified strong ridge complex along the west coast of North America we have had other influences specifically the convection in the Indian Ocean influencing the polar jet more strongly, and more consistently.  The result of this influence has been more of a progressive pacific jet across the entire northern third of the pacific.  The result of this progressive and fairly strong flow across the Pacific is to send piece after piece of 500 mb energy into our West Coast deamplifying the ridging in that area. So we can never really get, to this point, northern energy to phase with Southern energy because there's no amplification of that ridging.  Unfortunately it looks like the current pulse of energy and convection in the Indian Ocean seems to become becoming stronger. We will have to see if this area relaxes some but if it doesn't and the MJ oh makes it into faces three and specially for we may need that stratospheric warming event as an absolute key to save our winter.  

That's my take simply stated. Maybe Frank or others could comment.

To illustrate that point further this is the current look at the flow across the PAC as per the Euro.  Notice just how progressive it is through out the Pac:  The result of this are multiple lobes of ULL in and around the Aluetian Islands instead of one strong deep ULL and associated trough S of the A Islands.  The strong progressive Pac flow is leading to pieces of those ULL(yellow X and arrow) to constantly break off and undercut the west coast ridging de-amplifying it. There is still some ridging in the west.  That's why we are getting outr cold/cool shots, but its transient and constantly being dampened because of these factors in the Pac.

Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 <a href=Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 Ecmwf_41" />
Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 <a href=Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 Ecmwf_40" />

Here you can clearly see the enhancement of thePac/Polar jet via convection in the Indian Ocean.  Actual observation of the models depiction of the upper flow across the Pac.  Sat image:
Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 W_pac_12

Now if the Pac were to "BEHAVE " better, we would want it to look more like this.
Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 Ecmwf_43

Instead of a west to east orientation we want a more N to S orientation to the Pac flow.  One of two things or both are needed for this to happen.  We need the Indian Ocean to quite down.  This might allow the convection around the dateline to the draw the Aleutian trough further S of the islands.  This would consolidate all the energy into one deep trough.  In theory this then amplifys the ridge out ahead.  And when pieces of energy break off it(yellow X and arrow) they are forced up and over the strong west coast ridge only to dive down into the central conus with more gusto then we have had so far and the chances for phasing increases with the STJ.  

The other "thing" we need to happen, and honestly this is probably the most important as I don't think the IO shuts down without this, is the Strat warming.  A warm strat over the N pole leads to expanding air pushing down on the Troposhpere.  This would in theory push the Aleutian trough further south as a result and hopefully allow it to link back up more strongly and consistently with the convection around the dateline.  Without that the Pac remains progressive and the Convection in the tropics continues to enhance the STJ only instead of both the STJ, AND the Aleutian trough and we need the timing of our N and S energies to be perfect.

_________________
"In weather and in life, there's no winning and losing; there's only winning and learning."
WINTER 2012/2013 TOTALS 43.65"WINTER 2017/2018 TOTALS 62.85" WINTER 2022/2023 TOTALS 4.9"      
WINTER 2013/2014 TOTALS 64.85"WINTER 2018/2019 TOTALS 14.25" WINTER 2023/2024 TOTALS 13.1"
WINTER 2014/2015 TOTALS 71.20"WINTER 2019/2020 TOTALS 6.35"   WINTER 2024/2025 TOTALS 0.00
WINTER 2015/2016 TOTALS 35.00"WINTER 2020/2021 TOTALS 37.75"
WINTER 2016/2017 TOTALS 42.25"WINTER 2021/2022 TOTALS 31.65" 
sroc4
sroc4
Admin
Admin

Posts : 8458
Reputation : 302
Join date : 2013-01-07
Location : Wading River, LI

Back to top Go down

Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 Empty Re: Long Range Thread 9.0

Post by Guest Fri Jan 15, 2016 10:15 am

We're Screwed basically.!!!

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 Empty Re: Long Range Thread 9.0

Post by sroc4 Fri Jan 15, 2016 10:23 am

syosnow94 wrote:We're Screwed basically.!!!

Not yet

_________________
"In weather and in life, there's no winning and losing; there's only winning and learning."
WINTER 2012/2013 TOTALS 43.65"WINTER 2017/2018 TOTALS 62.85" WINTER 2022/2023 TOTALS 4.9"      
WINTER 2013/2014 TOTALS 64.85"WINTER 2018/2019 TOTALS 14.25" WINTER 2023/2024 TOTALS 13.1"
WINTER 2014/2015 TOTALS 71.20"WINTER 2019/2020 TOTALS 6.35"   WINTER 2024/2025 TOTALS 0.00
WINTER 2015/2016 TOTALS 35.00"WINTER 2020/2021 TOTALS 37.75"
WINTER 2016/2017 TOTALS 42.25"WINTER 2021/2022 TOTALS 31.65" 
sroc4
sroc4
Admin
Admin

Posts : 8458
Reputation : 302
Join date : 2013-01-07
Location : Wading River, LI

Back to top Go down

Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 Empty Re: Long Range Thread 9.0

Post by skinsfan1177 Fri Jan 15, 2016 10:51 am

sroc4 wrote:
sroc4 wrote:
skinsfan1177 wrote:Can someone explain to what it means for the Pac to cooperate

In general that's a pretty complex question. In a nutshell we have  had convection in and around the dateline for some time.  We have had that convection focused to that area pretty much the entire season so far. However  we have only seen transient influences on the sub Aleutian trough. Instead of that area locking in that trough south of the Aleutian Islands which in turn would promote a amplified strong ridge complex along the west coast of North America we have had other influences specifically the convection in the Indian Ocean influencing the polar jet more strongly, and more consistently.  The result of this influence has been more of a progressive pacific jet across the entire northern third of the pacific.  The result of this progressive and fairly strong flow across the Pacific is to send piece after piece of 500 mb energy into our West Coast deamplifying the ridging in that area. So we can never really get, to this point, northern energy to phase with Southern energy because there's no amplification of that ridging.  Unfortunately it looks like the current pulse of energy and convection in the Indian Ocean seems to become becoming stronger. We will have to see if this area relaxes some but if it doesn't and the MJ oh makes it into faces three and specially for we may need that stratospheric warming event as an absolute key to save our winter.  

That's my take simply stated. Maybe Frank or others could comment.

To illustrate that point further this is the current look at the flow across the PAC as per the Euro.  Notice just how progressive it is through out the Pac:  The result of this are multiple lobes of ULL in and around the Aluetian Islands instead of one strong deep ULL and associated trough S of the A Islands.  The strong progressive Pac flow is leading to pieces of those ULL(yellow X and arrow) to constantly break off and undercut the west coast ridging de-amplifying it. There is still some ridging in the west.  That's why we are getting outr cold/cool shots, but its transient and constantly being dampened because of these factors in the Pac.

Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 <a href=Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 Ecmwf_41" />
Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 <a href=Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 Ecmwf_40" />

Here you can clearly see the enhancement of thePac/Polar jet via convection in the Indian Ocean.  Actual observation of the models depiction of the upper flow across the Pac.  Sat image:
Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 W_pac_12

Now if the Pac were to "BEHAVE " better, we would want it to look more like this.
Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 Ecmwf_43

Instead of a west to east orientation we want a more N to S orientation to the Pac flow.  One of two things or both are needed for this to happen.  We need the Indian Ocean to quite down.  This might allow the convection around the dateline to the draw the Aleutian trough further S of the islands.  This would consolidate all the energy into one deep trough.  In theory this then amplifys the ridge out ahead.  And when pieces of energy break off it(yellow X and arrow) they are forced up and over the strong west coast ridge only to dive down into the central conus with more gusto then we have had so far and the chances for phasing increases with the STJ.  

The other "thing" we need to happen, and honestly this is probably the most important as I don't think the IO shuts down without this, is the Strat warming.  A warm strat over the N pole leads to expanding air pushing down on the Troposhpere.  This would in theory push the Aleutian trough further south as a result and hopefully allow it to link back up more strongly and consistently with the convection around the dateline.  Without that the Pac remains progressive and the Convection in the tropics continues to enhance the STJ only instead of both the STJ, AND the Aleutian trough and we need the timing of our N and S energies to be perfect.

Thank you sroc for the the incredible explanation I appreciate it.
skinsfan1177
skinsfan1177
Senior Enthusiast
Senior Enthusiast

Posts : 4485
Reputation : 35
Join date : 2013-01-07
Age : 47
Location : Point Pleasant Boro

Back to top Go down

Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 Empty Re: Long Range Thread 9.0

Post by sroc4 Fri Jan 15, 2016 11:15 am

You bet Skins.  These sorts of questions force me to look at things at diff angles, so thank you.

_________________
"In weather and in life, there's no winning and losing; there's only winning and learning."
WINTER 2012/2013 TOTALS 43.65"WINTER 2017/2018 TOTALS 62.85" WINTER 2022/2023 TOTALS 4.9"      
WINTER 2013/2014 TOTALS 64.85"WINTER 2018/2019 TOTALS 14.25" WINTER 2023/2024 TOTALS 13.1"
WINTER 2014/2015 TOTALS 71.20"WINTER 2019/2020 TOTALS 6.35"   WINTER 2024/2025 TOTALS 0.00
WINTER 2015/2016 TOTALS 35.00"WINTER 2020/2021 TOTALS 37.75"
WINTER 2016/2017 TOTALS 42.25"WINTER 2021/2022 TOTALS 31.65" 
sroc4
sroc4
Admin
Admin

Posts : 8458
Reputation : 302
Join date : 2013-01-07
Location : Wading River, LI

Back to top Go down

Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 Empty Re: Long Range Thread 9.0

Post by amugs Fri Jan 15, 2016 11:18 am

This is not good news about the PV from Dr Cohen who was adamant about this

Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 2283620a00b22465a538f243dd533de5

_________________
Mugs 
AKA:King: Snow Weenie
Self Proclaimed
WINTER 2014-15 : 55.12" +.02 for 6 coatings (avg. 35")
WINTER 2015-16 Total - 29.8" (Avg 35")
WINTER 2016-17 : 39.5" so far
amugs
amugs
Advanced Forecaster - Mod
Advanced Forecaster - Mod

Posts : 15157
Reputation : 213
Join date : 2013-01-07
Age : 54
Location : Hillsdale,NJ

Back to top Go down

Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 Empty Re: Long Range Thread 9.0

Post by Bkdude Fri Jan 15, 2016 11:21 am

Yikes

Bkdude

Posts : 87
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2016-01-01

Back to top Go down

Long Range Thread 9.0 - Page 17 Empty Re: Long Range Thread 9.0

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 17 of 40 Previous  1 ... 10 ... 16, 17, 18 ... 28 ... 40  Next

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum