NJ Strong Weather Forum


Join the forum, it's quick and easy

NJ Strong Weather Forum
NJ Strong Weather Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Long Range Discussion 22.0

+33
skinsfan1177
chief7
WeatherBob
emokid51783
hyde345
jmanley32
dsix85
jaydoy
billg315
lglickman1
CPcantmeasuresnow
Snow88
mmanisca
phil155
weatherwatchermom
Dunnzoo
nutleyblizzard
Radz
Irish
Wheezer
Math23x7
rb924119
SENJsnowman
heehaw453
algae888
aiannone
MattyICE
frank 638
Frank_Wx
docstox12
dkodgis
amugs
sroc4
37 posters

Page 18 of 31 Previous  1 ... 10 ... 17, 18, 19 ... 24 ... 31  Next

Go down

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by rb924119 Thu Dec 30, 2021 12:17 pm

Great discussion in here by sroc and heehaw about the possible event a few days from now. I’ve not been paying attention, as all of my focus has been on the extended, but, it would be a nice change of pace for sure haha unfortunately, with the way my schedule will be, I probably won’t have time to chime in, but if I can, I will. If not, I’m sure we’ll have plenty of other opportunities coming up Wink besides, we’re in good hands with these two Smile

rb924119
Meteorologist
Meteorologist

Posts : 7042
Join date : 2013-02-06

MattyICE likes this post

Back to top Go down

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by rb924119 Thu Dec 30, 2021 12:37 pm

Interesting changes afoot with respect to the MJO forecasts:

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 86c26210
cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 A549ae10
cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 6ac91a10

Compared to recent runs, both the EURO and GFS Ensemble are longer and stronger in Phase 8 before returning more briefly but stronger into Phase 7 and then coming back out into Phase 8 with more amplitude. The CFS generally keeps the wave progressing along, though it is known to have a bias for that. In this case, however, I think the CFS evolution is more on track since the other guidance is seemingly headed in that direction. I also like it now because it is aligning with my preconceived ideas.

Regarding the maps, I don’t think last night’s EURO Ensemble is correct in its depiction of the evolution, and even at the end of its run, it began adjusting toward the GFS and GEM Ensembles, which both more or less evolve how I am expecting. On top of that, this should be an approximation of where we are headed based on the interplay between La Niña and the MJO Phase 8:

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 8a520110

Looks very similar to the GFS and GEM Ensembles, doesn’t it? Wink

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 E4f2e910
cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 4f1a9910

I do think that there’s some room for a slightly further east correction in both of these, which would align very well with the composite, and I think we will see that as we get closer. Just my opinion, though.

rb924119
Meteorologist
Meteorologist

Posts : 7042
Join date : 2013-02-06

heehaw453 likes this post

Back to top Go down

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by heehaw453 Thu Dec 30, 2021 1:23 pm

rb924119 wrote:Interesting changes afoot with respect to the MJO forecasts:

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 86c26210
cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 A549ae10
cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 6ac91a10

Compared to recent runs, both the EURO and GFS Ensemble are longer and stronger in Phase 8 before returning more briefly but stronger into Phase 7 and then coming back out into Phase 8 with more amplitude. The CFS generally keeps the wave progressing along, though it is known to have a bias for that. In this case, however, I think the CFS evolution is more on track since the other guidance is seemingly headed in that direction. I also like it now because it is aligning with my preconceived ideas.

Regarding the maps, I don’t think last night’s EURO Ensemble is correct in its depiction of the evolution, and even at the end of its run, it began adjusting toward the GFS and GEM Ensembles, which both more or less evolve how I am expecting. On top of that, this should be an approximation of where we are headed based on the interplay between La Niña and the MJO Phase 8:

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 8a520110

Looks very similar to the GFS and GEM Ensembles, doesn’t it? Wink

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 E4f2e910
cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 4f1a9910

I do think that there’s some room for a slightly further east correction in both of these, which would align very well with the composite, and I think we will see that as we get closer. Just my opinion, though.

Very 2014/15 look there!

heehaw453
Advanced Forecaster
Advanced Forecaster

Posts : 3916
Reputation : 86
Join date : 2014-01-20
Location : Bedminster Township, PA Elevation 600' ASL

rb924119 likes this post

Back to top Go down

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by rb924119 Thu Dec 30, 2021 1:33 pm

heehaw453 wrote:
rb924119 wrote:Interesting changes afoot with respect to the MJO forecasts:

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 86c26210
cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 A549ae10
cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 6ac91a10

Compared to recent runs, both the EURO and GFS Ensemble are longer and stronger in Phase 8 before returning more briefly but stronger into Phase 7 and then coming back out into Phase 8 with more amplitude. The CFS generally keeps the wave progressing along, though it is known to have a bias for that. In this case, however, I think the CFS evolution is more on track since the other guidance is seemingly headed in that direction. I also like it now because it is aligning with my preconceived ideas.

Regarding the maps, I don’t think last night’s EURO Ensemble is correct in its depiction of the evolution, and even at the end of its run, it began adjusting toward the GFS and GEM Ensembles, which both more or less evolve how I am expecting. On top of that, this should be an approximation of where we are headed based on the interplay between La Niña and the MJO Phase 8:

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 8a520110

Looks very similar to the GFS and GEM Ensembles, doesn’t it? Wink

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 E4f2e910
cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 4f1a9910

I do think that there’s some room for a slightly further east correction in both of these, which would align very well with the composite, and I think we will see that as we get closer. Just my opinion, though.

Very 2014/15 look there!

Wow, what a memory!! And what a match!! What a Face

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 474b7710

rb924119
Meteorologist
Meteorologist

Posts : 7042
Reputation : 195
Join date : 2013-02-06
Age : 32
Location : Greentown, Pa

Back to top Go down

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by rb924119 Thu Dec 30, 2021 1:35 pm

Significant storm signal on the GFS and GEM Ensembles 14th-16th, in case anybody was wondering Smile

rb924119
Meteorologist
Meteorologist

Posts : 7042
Reputation : 195
Join date : 2013-02-06
Age : 32
Location : Greentown, Pa

amugs and Bwtr like this post

Back to top Go down

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by heehaw453 Thu Dec 30, 2021 1:43 pm

I'm going to go Rayno on here.  Snowfall chances usually occur with cold air on the way in and out.  After 1/6 we stand to get some decent cold air.  There is significant western ridging occurring at that time too.  So I would say that is another window.  These may not work out, but at least there is something better to look at than a perpetual trough hanging out in PNA land.

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Euro33

heehaw453
Advanced Forecaster
Advanced Forecaster

Posts : 3916
Reputation : 86
Join date : 2014-01-20
Location : Bedminster Township, PA Elevation 600' ASL

rb924119 likes this post

Back to top Go down

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by amugs Thu Dec 30, 2021 1:46 pm

That's my call going back 2 or 3rd week NESIS storm rb ^^^.
Also, The Hovmoller maps I will post later but the show the wave going to 7/8 border and then into 8. MJO phase 5/6 did some dirty work for a + EAMT where that warm tropical air hits the massive east Asian mountains and lack of better terms torques the atmosphere above it perturbed it greatly. All that warm air then can cause perturbation in the PV and it also has upstream affects on the PAC JET pattern since it can create Higher Pressures over the region and lower pressures over the Korean Kamchuck Pennisula with HP to its east retracting a anticyclonic break to the jet structure. This then affects everything to its east and above in the Arctic. MJO wave is impossible the tropics help dictate the pattern.

1/3 may kick us off in a crappy pattern. GEFS show a lean at Delmarva region.
33 rain wx

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 D01EA3EF-1B76-414E-ACE8-D81CEDFC3192.jpeg.f6b6cabc93adb3935afc6d7d3eb71080

_________________
Mugs 
AKA:King: Snow Weenie
Self Proclaimed
WINTER 2014-15 : 55.12" +.02 for 6 coatings (avg. 35")
WINTER 2015-16 Total - 29.8" (Avg 35")
WINTER 2016-17 : 39.5" so far
amugs
amugs
Advanced Forecaster - Mod
Advanced Forecaster - Mod

Posts : 15133
Reputation : 213
Join date : 2013-01-07
Age : 54
Location : Hillsdale,NJ

rb924119 likes this post

Back to top Go down

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by rb924119 Thu Dec 30, 2021 1:48 pm

heehaw453 wrote:I'm going to go Rayno on here.  Snowfall chances usually occur with cold air on the way in and out.  After 1/6 we stand to get some decent cold air.  There is significant western ridging occurring at that time too.  So I would say that is another window.  These may not work out, but at least there is something better to look at than a perpetual trough hanging out in PNA land.

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Euro33

Gahhh!! You beat me to it!! Haha I was just looking at this lmao unfortunately, I don’t think that the pattern will be quite ready yet to give us the goods on this one, but central New England and points north will likely do well in my opinion. DEFINITELY bears watching, though, as this is the beginning of the transitional window, and like you said, storms tend accompany these changes. WE TRACK!!

rb924119
Meteorologist
Meteorologist

Posts : 7042
Reputation : 195
Join date : 2013-02-06
Age : 32
Location : Greentown, Pa

Back to top Go down

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by rb924119 Thu Dec 30, 2021 1:53 pm

amugs wrote:That's my call going back 2 or 3rd week NESIS storm rb ^^^.
Also, The Hovmoller maps I will post later but the show the wave going to 7/8 border and then into 8.
MJO phase 5/6 did some dirty work for a + EAMT where that warm tropical air hits the massive east Asian mountains and lack of better terms torques the atmosphere above it perturbed it greatly. All that warm air then can cause perturbation in the PV and it also has upstream affects on the PAC JET pattern since it can create Higher Pressures over the region and  lower pressures over the Korean Kamchuck Pennisula with HP to its east retracting a anticyclonic break to the jet structure. This then affects everything to its east and above in the Arctic. MJO wave is impossible the tropics help dictate the pattern.

1/3 may kick us off in a crappy pattern. GEFS show a lean at Delmarva region.
33 rain wx

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 D01EA3EF-1B76-414E-ACE8-D81CEDFC3192.jpeg.f6b6cabc93adb3935afc6d7d3eb71080

Yeah, we’ve both been bullish on the NESIS threat during that period, and I can’t wait to see the Hovmoellers later, because that timing and progression would be right on cue. Keep reelin’ brother!!

rb924119
Meteorologist
Meteorologist

Posts : 7042
Reputation : 195
Join date : 2013-02-06
Age : 32
Location : Greentown, Pa

Back to top Go down

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by heehaw453 Thu Dec 30, 2021 3:54 pm

If you want snow on Sunday/Monday then this is the look you want to see.  Very vigorous s/w energy around a digging trough.  We just don't see support so far on guidance besides GFS.  This NAM is only to demonstrate the look.  

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Nam21

heehaw453
Advanced Forecaster
Advanced Forecaster

Posts : 3916
Reputation : 86
Join date : 2014-01-20
Location : Bedminster Township, PA Elevation 600' ASL

CPcantmeasuresnow and rb924119 like this post

Back to top Go down

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by sroc4 Thu Dec 30, 2021 4:28 pm

heehaw453 wrote:If you want snow on Sunday/Monday then this is the look you want to see.  Very vigorous s/w energy around a digging trough.  We just don't see support so far on guidance besides GFS.  This NAM is only to demonstrate the look.  

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Nam21

All it takes is one or two runs.  It doesnt matter which model......

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 ?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia1.tenor.com%2Fimages%2Ff3274f43501360663d3c228d6be635cd%2Ftenor

_________________
"In weather and in life, there's no winning and losing; there's only winning and learning."
WINTER 2012/2013 TOTALS 43.65"WINTER 2017/2018 TOTALS 62.85" WINTER 2022/2023 TOTALS 4.9"      
WINTER 2013/2014 TOTALS 64.85"WINTER 2018/2019 TOTALS 14.25" WINTER 2023/2024 TOTALS 13.1"
WINTER 2014/2015 TOTALS 71.20"WINTER 2019/2020 TOTALS 6.35"
WINTER 2015/2016 TOTALS 35.00"WINTER 2020/2021 TOTALS 37.75"
WINTER 2016/2017 TOTALS 42.25"WINTER 2021/2022 TOTALS 31.65" 
sroc4
sroc4
Admin
Admin

Posts : 8446
Reputation : 302
Join date : 2013-01-07
Location : Wading River, LI

CPcantmeasuresnow, rb924119, crippo84 and heehaw453 like this post

Back to top Go down

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by heehaw453 Thu Dec 30, 2021 5:05 pm

Im not concerned about surface panels. This 18Z GFS going nuclear with this storm. IMO coastal areas would be hammered with kind of look. Eastern LI and coastal NJ in particular.

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Gfs39

heehaw453
Advanced Forecaster
Advanced Forecaster

Posts : 3916
Reputation : 86
Join date : 2014-01-20
Location : Bedminster Township, PA Elevation 600' ASL

rb924119 likes this post

Back to top Go down

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by Irish Thu Dec 30, 2021 5:18 pm

You guys can't possibly be talking about a storm this Sunday as the temps hit 60! No? Looks like a complete wash out all weekend.
Irish
Irish
Pro Enthusiast
Pro Enthusiast

Posts : 788
Reputation : 19
Join date : 2019-01-16
Age : 46
Location : Old Bridge, NJ

rb924119 likes this post

Back to top Go down

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by heehaw453 Thu Dec 30, 2021 5:24 pm

GFS for the coastal folks.  

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Realit10

heehaw453
Advanced Forecaster
Advanced Forecaster

Posts : 3916
Reputation : 86
Join date : 2014-01-20
Location : Bedminster Township, PA Elevation 600' ASL

sroc4 and rb924119 like this post

Back to top Go down

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by nutleyblizzard Thu Dec 30, 2021 5:26 pm

Wow a close miss for Monday’s storm on the GFS. Jeff Smith just mentioned that it needs to be watched. The Nam also shows the threat. I would like to see the Euro jump on board as well, but it was trending that way with the 12z run.
nutleyblizzard
nutleyblizzard
Senior Enthusiast
Senior Enthusiast

Posts : 1963
Reputation : 41
Join date : 2014-01-30
Age : 58
Location : Nutley, new jersey

Back to top Go down

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by sroc4 Thu Dec 30, 2021 5:30 pm

Irish wrote:You guys can't possibly be talking about a storm this Sunday as the temps hit 60!  No?  Looks like a complete wash out all weekend.

It would likely be Monday am

_________________
"In weather and in life, there's no winning and losing; there's only winning and learning."
WINTER 2012/2013 TOTALS 43.65"WINTER 2017/2018 TOTALS 62.85" WINTER 2022/2023 TOTALS 4.9"      
WINTER 2013/2014 TOTALS 64.85"WINTER 2018/2019 TOTALS 14.25" WINTER 2023/2024 TOTALS 13.1"
WINTER 2014/2015 TOTALS 71.20"WINTER 2019/2020 TOTALS 6.35"
WINTER 2015/2016 TOTALS 35.00"WINTER 2020/2021 TOTALS 37.75"
WINTER 2016/2017 TOTALS 42.25"WINTER 2021/2022 TOTALS 31.65" 
sroc4
sroc4
Admin
Admin

Posts : 8446
Reputation : 302
Join date : 2013-01-07
Location : Wading River, LI

Irish likes this post

Back to top Go down

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by heehaw453 Thu Dec 30, 2021 5:38 pm

This panel says it all.  Yeah you'd want it about 75 miles north or so, but those are details that can't be known ATTM.  Look at tilt of the trough and the strength of the ULL.  I'm out of the big game potential geographically and it excites me just to see it.  LOL.

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 500mb13

heehaw453
Advanced Forecaster
Advanced Forecaster

Posts : 3916
Reputation : 86
Join date : 2014-01-20
Location : Bedminster Township, PA Elevation 600' ASL

rb924119 likes this post

Back to top Go down

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by sroc4 Thu Dec 30, 2021 5:39 pm

sroc4 wrote:
Irish wrote:You guys can't possibly be talking about a storm this Sunday as the temps hit 60!  No?  Looks like a complete wash out all weekend.

It would likely be Monday am

Im not quite ready to look at the details at the surface yet, BUT GFS has dew points falling into the upper 20's and low 30's by Sunday eve and then down to mid to low twenties right as the precip moves in during the wee hrs of Monday am. Keep in mind the rain and warm temps from the weekend will drag a cold front through. If dew points do fall similar to what the GFS is showing ahead of the precip then we have alot of room for dynamic/evaporative cooling to take place quickly dropping the surface temps.

This is all preliminary.

_________________
"In weather and in life, there's no winning and losing; there's only winning and learning."
WINTER 2012/2013 TOTALS 43.65"WINTER 2017/2018 TOTALS 62.85" WINTER 2022/2023 TOTALS 4.9"      
WINTER 2013/2014 TOTALS 64.85"WINTER 2018/2019 TOTALS 14.25" WINTER 2023/2024 TOTALS 13.1"
WINTER 2014/2015 TOTALS 71.20"WINTER 2019/2020 TOTALS 6.35"
WINTER 2015/2016 TOTALS 35.00"WINTER 2020/2021 TOTALS 37.75"
WINTER 2016/2017 TOTALS 42.25"WINTER 2021/2022 TOTALS 31.65" 
sroc4
sroc4
Admin
Admin

Posts : 8446
Reputation : 302
Join date : 2013-01-07
Location : Wading River, LI

rb924119 likes this post

Back to top Go down

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by sroc4 Thu Dec 30, 2021 5:42 pm

heehaw453 wrote:This panel says it all.  Yeah you'd want it about 75 miles north or so, but those are details that can't be known ATTM.  Look at tilt of the trough and the strength of the ULL.  I'm out of the big game potential geographically and it excites me just to see it.  LOL.

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 500mb13

Take a quick peek at the jet streak on the GFS between 300mb & 250mb.  Again exact timing and positioning and temp profiles still need a day or two of ironing but that JS might indicate the precip shield should be further N than the surface reflection indicates.

_________________
"In weather and in life, there's no winning and losing; there's only winning and learning."
WINTER 2012/2013 TOTALS 43.65"WINTER 2017/2018 TOTALS 62.85" WINTER 2022/2023 TOTALS 4.9"      
WINTER 2013/2014 TOTALS 64.85"WINTER 2018/2019 TOTALS 14.25" WINTER 2023/2024 TOTALS 13.1"
WINTER 2014/2015 TOTALS 71.20"WINTER 2019/2020 TOTALS 6.35"
WINTER 2015/2016 TOTALS 35.00"WINTER 2020/2021 TOTALS 37.75"
WINTER 2016/2017 TOTALS 42.25"WINTER 2021/2022 TOTALS 31.65" 
sroc4
sroc4
Admin
Admin

Posts : 8446
Reputation : 302
Join date : 2013-01-07
Location : Wading River, LI

rb924119 likes this post

Back to top Go down

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by heehaw453 Thu Dec 30, 2021 6:25 pm

sroc4 wrote:
heehaw453 wrote:This panel says it all.  Yeah you'd want it about 75 miles north or so, but those are details that can't be known ATTM.  Look at tilt of the trough and the strength of the ULL.  I'm out of the big game potential geographically and it excites me just to see it.  LOL.

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 500mb13

Take a quick peek at the jet streak on the GFS between 300mb & 250mb.  Again exact timing and positioning and temp profiles still need a day or two of ironing but that JS might indicate the precip shield should be further N than the surface reflection indicates.

Totally agree and good point. The tilt of the trough indicative of much broader precip field too. That's why I was saying not even looking at the surface panels. This look would hammer your area and coastal NJ.

There needs to be some more support though among other guidance. GFS could be playing a cruel trick LOL. Seen it over amplify system before only to pull back within 48 hours. So for now it's a soft sell for me.

heehaw453
Advanced Forecaster
Advanced Forecaster

Posts : 3916
Reputation : 86
Join date : 2014-01-20
Location : Bedminster Township, PA Elevation 600' ASL

sroc4 and rb924119 like this post

Back to top Go down

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by sroc4 Thu Dec 30, 2021 7:05 pm

heehaw453 wrote:
sroc4 wrote:
heehaw453 wrote:This panel says it all.  Yeah you'd want it about 75 miles north or so, but those are details that can't be known ATTM.  Look at tilt of the trough and the strength of the ULL.  I'm out of the big game potential geographically and it excites me just to see it.  LOL.

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 500mb13

Take a quick peek at the jet streak on the GFS between 300mb & 250mb.  Again exact timing and positioning and temp profiles still need a day or two of ironing but that JS might indicate the precip shield should be further N than the surface reflection indicates.

Totally agree and good point.  The tilt of the trough indicative of much broader precip field too.  That's why I was saying not even looking at the surface panels.  This look would hammer your area and coastal NJ.  

There needs to be some more support though among other guidance.  GFS could be playing a cruel trick LOL.  Seen it over amplify system before only to pull back within 48 hours.  So for now it's a soft sell for me.

Could not agree more. Until I see the Euro shift I will not get excited. Euro and CMC have been steadfast in keeping it very positively tilted with very little phasing of the energy. As a general rule When the GFS and Euro differ in the track the final solns ends up somewhere in the middle of the cone they create with their differing storm tracks. If that holds true it still will be a swing and miss. 18z euro rolling now.

_________________
"In weather and in life, there's no winning and losing; there's only winning and learning."
WINTER 2012/2013 TOTALS 43.65"WINTER 2017/2018 TOTALS 62.85" WINTER 2022/2023 TOTALS 4.9"      
WINTER 2013/2014 TOTALS 64.85"WINTER 2018/2019 TOTALS 14.25" WINTER 2023/2024 TOTALS 13.1"
WINTER 2014/2015 TOTALS 71.20"WINTER 2019/2020 TOTALS 6.35"
WINTER 2015/2016 TOTALS 35.00"WINTER 2020/2021 TOTALS 37.75"
WINTER 2016/2017 TOTALS 42.25"WINTER 2021/2022 TOTALS 31.65" 
sroc4
sroc4
Admin
Admin

Posts : 8446
Reputation : 302
Join date : 2013-01-07
Location : Wading River, LI

rb924119 likes this post

Back to top Go down

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by Frank_Wx Thu Dec 30, 2021 7:14 pm

The greatest threat to Monday’s storm is yet another anomalous surface low over Alaska pushing into the west coast, turning the flow progressive and disrupting the needed phase at 500mb along the east coast. For now I put chances at 10% for accumulation in Central Park, which is the highest yet this season. Hopefully we can get something to work out. If it doesn’t work out, it’s because of this dreaded -WPO regime we have been in.

Beyond Monday, the -WPO ridge is posed to move north and pinch off over the Arctic. As mentioned already by many on here, this follows a window of opportunity where we can get cross polar flow of arctic air into the central and eastern CONUS from the 5th to the 15th. In my opinion, that is the 10-day window to get something really going. Unfortunately, I’m not as optimistic as others that things turn around late January into February. The way Nina looks, and the overall makeup of the Tropospheric 500mb pattern and lack of coupling with the Stratosphere, I see another -WPO/-PNA pattern trying to take shape late Jan. Still a wayyyy long way to go before we get there. I’ll assess again in ten days or so..

_________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

CLICK HERE to view NJ Strong Snowstorm Classifications
Frank_Wx
Frank_Wx
Godzilla Seeker
Godzilla Seeker

Posts : 21311
Reputation : 328
Join date : 2013-01-05
Age : 32
Location : Jersey City, NJ

http://njstrongweather.blogspot.com/

rb924119 and heehaw453 like this post

Back to top Go down

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by Frank_Wx Thu Dec 30, 2021 7:17 pm

sroc4 wrote:
heehaw453 wrote:
sroc4 wrote:
heehaw453 wrote:This panel says it all.  Yeah you'd want it about 75 miles north or so, but those are details that can't be known ATTM.  Look at tilt of the trough and the strength of the ULL.  I'm out of the big game potential geographically and it excites me just to see it.  LOL.

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 500mb13

Take a quick peek at the jet streak on the GFS between 300mb & 250mb.  Again exact timing and positioning and temp profiles still need a day or two of ironing but that JS might indicate the precip shield should be further N than the surface reflection indicates.

Totally agree and good point.  The tilt of the trough indicative of much broader precip field too.  That's why I was saying not even looking at the surface panels.  This look would hammer your area and coastal NJ.  

There needs to be some more support though among other guidance.  GFS could be playing a cruel trick LOL.  Seen it over amplify system before only to pull back within 48 hours.  So for now it's a soft sell for me.

Could not agree more.  Until I see the Euro shift I will not get excited.  Euro and CMC have been steadfast in keeping it very positively tilted with very little phasing of the energy.  As a general rule When the GFS and Euro differ in the track the final solns ends up somewhere in the middle of the cone they create with their differing storm tracks.  If that holds true it still will be a swing and miss.  18z euro rolling now.  

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Cbb8e610

_________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

CLICK HERE to view NJ Strong Snowstorm Classifications
Frank_Wx
Frank_Wx
Godzilla Seeker
Godzilla Seeker

Posts : 21311
Reputation : 328
Join date : 2013-01-05
Age : 32
Location : Jersey City, NJ

http://njstrongweather.blogspot.com/

Back to top Go down

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by sroc4 Thu Dec 30, 2021 7:28 pm

Frank_Wx wrote:
sroc4 wrote:
heehaw453 wrote:
sroc4 wrote:
heehaw453 wrote:This panel says it all.  Yeah you'd want it about 75 miles north or so, but those are details that can't be known ATTM.  Look at tilt of the trough and the strength of the ULL.  I'm out of the big game potential geographically and it excites me just to see it.  LOL.

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 500mb13

Take a quick peek at the jet streak on the GFS between 300mb & 250mb.  Again exact timing and positioning and temp profiles still need a day or two of ironing but that JS might indicate the precip shield should be further N than the surface reflection indicates.

Totally agree and good point.  The tilt of the trough indicative of much broader precip field too.  That's why I was saying not even looking at the surface panels.  This look would hammer your area and coastal NJ.  

There needs to be some more support though among other guidance.  GFS could be playing a cruel trick LOL.  Seen it over amplify system before only to pull back within 48 hours.  So for now it's a soft sell for me.

Could not agree more.  Until I see the Euro shift I will not get excited.  Euro and CMC have been steadfast in keeping it very positively tilted with very little phasing of the energy.  As a general rule When the GFS and Euro differ in the track the final solns ends up somewhere in the middle of the cone they create with their differing storm tracks.  If that holds true it still will be a swing and miss.  18z euro rolling now.  

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Cbb8e610

Interestingly enough the Euro ens agrees with its operations.  But so does the GFS Ensemble.  18z actually shifted its cluster N on GFS.   Battle of the Americans vs the Europeans

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Eurooo10
cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Gfssss10

_________________
"In weather and in life, there's no winning and losing; there's only winning and learning."
WINTER 2012/2013 TOTALS 43.65"WINTER 2017/2018 TOTALS 62.85" WINTER 2022/2023 TOTALS 4.9"      
WINTER 2013/2014 TOTALS 64.85"WINTER 2018/2019 TOTALS 14.25" WINTER 2023/2024 TOTALS 13.1"
WINTER 2014/2015 TOTALS 71.20"WINTER 2019/2020 TOTALS 6.35"
WINTER 2015/2016 TOTALS 35.00"WINTER 2020/2021 TOTALS 37.75"
WINTER 2016/2017 TOTALS 42.25"WINTER 2021/2022 TOTALS 31.65" 
sroc4
sroc4
Admin
Admin

Posts : 8446
Reputation : 302
Join date : 2013-01-07
Location : Wading River, LI

Back to top Go down

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by sroc4 Thu Dec 30, 2021 7:28 pm

Crap its super small. Sorry I dont have time to fix it.

_________________
"In weather and in life, there's no winning and losing; there's only winning and learning."
WINTER 2012/2013 TOTALS 43.65"WINTER 2017/2018 TOTALS 62.85" WINTER 2022/2023 TOTALS 4.9"      
WINTER 2013/2014 TOTALS 64.85"WINTER 2018/2019 TOTALS 14.25" WINTER 2023/2024 TOTALS 13.1"
WINTER 2014/2015 TOTALS 71.20"WINTER 2019/2020 TOTALS 6.35"
WINTER 2015/2016 TOTALS 35.00"WINTER 2020/2021 TOTALS 37.75"
WINTER 2016/2017 TOTALS 42.25"WINTER 2021/2022 TOTALS 31.65" 
sroc4
sroc4
Admin
Admin

Posts : 8446
Reputation : 302
Join date : 2013-01-07
Location : Wading River, LI

Back to top Go down

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by amugs Thu Dec 30, 2021 9:04 pm

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Fh4k0810

_________________
Mugs 
AKA:King: Snow Weenie
Self Proclaimed
WINTER 2014-15 : 55.12" +.02 for 6 coatings (avg. 35")
WINTER 2015-16 Total - 29.8" (Avg 35")
WINTER 2016-17 : 39.5" so far
amugs
amugs
Advanced Forecaster - Mod
Advanced Forecaster - Mod

Posts : 15133
Reputation : 213
Join date : 2013-01-07
Age : 54
Location : Hillsdale,NJ

rb924119 likes this post

Back to top Go down

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by amugs Thu Dec 30, 2021 9:06 pm

Euro made a small adjustment with separation and a jog N at 18Z
Brooklyn 33nRain Map

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Ezgif.com-gif-maker.gif.0d36c51c172e8465c76b7e849ec97511

_________________
Mugs 
AKA:King: Snow Weenie
Self Proclaimed
WINTER 2014-15 : 55.12" +.02 for 6 coatings (avg. 35")
WINTER 2015-16 Total - 29.8" (Avg 35")
WINTER 2016-17 : 39.5" so far
amugs
amugs
Advanced Forecaster - Mod
Advanced Forecaster - Mod

Posts : 15133
Reputation : 213
Join date : 2013-01-07
Age : 54
Location : Hillsdale,NJ

Back to top Go down

cold - Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 18 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 18 of 31 Previous  1 ... 10 ... 17, 18, 19 ... 24 ... 31  Next

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum