Long Range Thread 27.0
+40
Artechmetals
essexcountypete
Carvin
hyde345
kalleg
uanswer2me
billg315
Radz
crippo84
Koroptim
Wheezer
chief7
GreyBeard
CPcantmeasuresnow
dsix85
toople
phil155
algae888
deadrabbit79
HectorO
Frozen.9
MattyICE
JT33
brownie
Irish
aiannone
Dunnzoo
SENJsnowman
tomsriversnowstorm
nutleyblizzard
jmanley32
frank 638
dkodgis
docstox12
heehaw453
Frank_Wx
amugs
rb924119
weatherwatchermom
sroc4
44 posters
Page 25 of 40
Page 25 of 40 • 1 ... 14 ... 24, 25, 26 ... 32 ... 40
Re: Long Range Thread 27.0
rb924119 wrote:Actually, the more I look at this, this looks like it could be more of a 12-18” / 14-20” event for those who are lucky enough to be in the right spot. Why? Well, at cursory glance, if this takes a track like I am expecting, the thermal profile should be PRIME for dendritic growth. Secondly, and this will require deeper digging on my end, but ratios to me look to average anywhere from about 15-20:1 with this storm. So, even though actual liquid equivalency will be between 1-1.5”, you can see how I’m getting the number mathematically. Lastly, this isn’t a classic “roll the system through” setup, meaning it’s not a situation where you have your storm and forcings just move through and it’s over. In this case, the storm is being forced to angle beneath the block. Basically, the mid-level energy and the storm gets squeezed between its normal forward motion and then getting squeezed/shunted southeastward as the block presses. What this does, is it stops the forward progress of the already negatively tilted trough, and then elongates it toward the southeast. As soon as it starts sliding southeast, as long as you’re north of the negatively tilted trough axis, you’re still going to be precipitating with decent forcing even though the surface low will be pulling away. On a radar, this present as a very long trailing comma head. This extended duration will just pile on. This actually is looking more and more like a big-ticket event to me.
I'm in agreement with you Rb. I think this is potentially an 18 hour event for some folks. And some folks could pick up in excess of 1'. This is not a quick hitter scenario and that H pressure being stout and pinned has me very fired up about this potential. The southern origin storms are usually very juicy and once they re-dip their feet in the Atlantic they usually provide very robust qpf.
heehaw453- Advanced Forecaster
- Posts : 3910
Join date : 2014-01-20
rb924119 and jmanley32 like this post
Re: Long Range Thread 27.0
[/quote]tomsriversnowstorm wrote:Actually the gfs was better for many in New Jersey.
quote="billg315"]Ok, I'll admit. For the first time in a long-time, I'm intrigued by this coming weekend system. lol. I do worry that the GFS has it sliding further south than the Euro and keeping the heaviest snow in the mid-Atlantic mostly to our south. The reason this worries me is ... it is a very El Nino type solution.
As a general rule, even if you know nothing about the upper level maps at all, when looking at a surface map if you draw a line depicting the GFS's Low track, and drew the same line for the Europeans low track as the system exists and departs the coast you can give yourself a reasonable cone of uncertainty. Similar to what you might see from the NWS for a hurricane. The final track almost always falls somewhere inside that cone.
sroc4- Admin
- Posts : 8445
Join date : 2013-01-07
rb924119 and jmanley32 like this post
heehaw453- Advanced Forecaster
- Posts : 3910
Reputation : 86
Join date : 2014-01-20
Location : Bedminster Township, PA Elevation 600' ASL
rb924119 likes this post
Re: Long Range Thread 27.0
heehaw453 wrote:rb924119 wrote:Actually, the more I look at this, this looks like it could be more of a 12-18” / 14-20” event for those who are lucky enough to be in the right spot. Why? Well, at cursory glance, if this takes a track like I am expecting, the thermal profile should be PRIME for dendritic growth. Secondly, and this will require deeper digging on my end, but ratios to me look to average anywhere from about 15-20:1 with this storm. So, even though actual liquid equivalency will be between 1-1.5”, you can see how I’m getting the number mathematically. Lastly, this isn’t a classic “roll the system through” setup, meaning it’s not a situation where you have your storm and forcings just move through and it’s over. In this case, the storm is being forced to angle beneath the block. Basically, the mid-level energy and the storm gets squeezed between its normal forward motion and then getting squeezed/shunted southeastward as the block presses. What this does, is it stops the forward progress of the already negatively tilted trough, and then elongates it toward the southeast. As soon as it starts sliding southeast, as long as you’re north of the negatively tilted trough axis, you’re still going to be precipitating with decent forcing even though the surface low will be pulling away. On a radar, this present as a very long trailing comma head. This extended duration will just pile on. This actually is looking more and more like a big-ticket event to me.
I'm in agreement with you Rb. I think this is potentially an 18 hour event for some folks. And some folks could pick up in excess of 1'. This is not a quick hitter scenario and that H pressure being stout and pinned has me very fired up about this potential. The southern origin storms are usually very juicy and once they re-dip their feet in the Atlantic they usually provide very robust qpf.
And not to get too far ahead of ourselves too, but I briefly looked at the upper levels 200-300mb and there is a dual jet structure that could add another hidden element of surprise in the positive direction.
And that HP on the 18z GFS doesnt budge throughout the event. On top of that it also got stronger as the Low heads off the coast. There is def alot to like here, but not ready to sound the alarm bells just yet.
_________________
"In weather and in life, there's no winning and losing; there's only winning and learning."
WINTER 2012/2013 TOTALS 43.65"WINTER 2017/2018 TOTALS 62.85" WINTER 2022/2023 TOTALS 4.9"
WINTER 2013/2014 TOTALS 64.85"WINTER 2018/2019 TOTALS 14.25" WINTER 2023/2024 TOTALS 13.1"
WINTER 2014/2015 TOTALS 71.20"WINTER 2019/2020 TOTALS 6.35"
WINTER 2015/2016 TOTALS 35.00"WINTER 2020/2021 TOTALS 37.75"
WINTER 2016/2017 TOTALS 42.25"WINTER 2021/2022 TOTALS 31.65"
sroc4- Admin
- Posts : 8445
Reputation : 302
Join date : 2013-01-07
Location : Wading River, LI
rb924119, heehaw453 and Irish like this post
Re: Long Range Thread 27.0
_________________
"In weather and in life, there's no winning and losing; there's only winning and learning."
WINTER 2012/2013 TOTALS 43.65"WINTER 2017/2018 TOTALS 62.85" WINTER 2022/2023 TOTALS 4.9"
WINTER 2013/2014 TOTALS 64.85"WINTER 2018/2019 TOTALS 14.25" WINTER 2023/2024 TOTALS 13.1"
WINTER 2014/2015 TOTALS 71.20"WINTER 2019/2020 TOTALS 6.35"
WINTER 2015/2016 TOTALS 35.00"WINTER 2020/2021 TOTALS 37.75"
WINTER 2016/2017 TOTALS 42.25"WINTER 2021/2022 TOTALS 31.65"
sroc4- Admin
- Posts : 8445
Reputation : 302
Join date : 2013-01-07
Location : Wading River, LI
rb924119 and heehaw453 like this post
Re: Long Range Thread 27.0
heehaw453 wrote:rb924119 wrote:Actually, the more I look at this, this looks like it could be more of a 12-18” / 14-20” event for those who are lucky enough to be in the right spot. Why? Well, at cursory glance, if this takes a track like I am expecting, the thermal profile should be PRIME for dendritic growth. Secondly, and this will require deeper digging on my end, but ratios to me look to average anywhere from about 15-20:1 with this storm. So, even though actual liquid equivalency will be between 1-1.5”, you can see how I’m getting the number mathematically. Lastly, this isn’t a classic “roll the system through” setup, meaning it’s not a situation where you have your storm and forcings just move through and it’s over. In this case, the storm is being forced to angle beneath the block. Basically, the mid-level energy and the storm gets squeezed between its normal forward motion and then getting squeezed/shunted southeastward as the block presses. What this does, is it stops the forward progress of the already negatively tilted trough, and then elongates it toward the southeast. As soon as it starts sliding southeast, as long as you’re north of the negatively tilted trough axis, you’re still going to be precipitating with decent forcing even though the surface low will be pulling away. On a radar, this present as a very long trailing comma head. This extended duration will just pile on. This actually is looking more and more like a big-ticket event to me.
I'm in agreement with you Rb. I think this is potentially an 18 hour event for some folks. And some folks could pick up in excess of 1'. This is not a quick hitter scenario and that H pressure being stout and pinned has me very fired up about this potential. The southern origin storms are usually very juicy and once they re-dip their feet in the Atlantic they usually provide very robust qpf.
Yup, agreed on all points. My source for a “secret weapon” of forecasting has some sort of issue with his links, and I can’t find my standard PWAT anomalies map, so I have to try to find a new one. But you’re right; this thing coming directly out of the Gulf plus Atlantic feed and it’s only producing ~1” QPF? Doesn’t add up, as it should be wetter than that.
rb924119- Meteorologist
- Posts : 7033
Reputation : 195
Join date : 2013-02-06
Age : 32
Location : Greentown, Pa
Re: Long Range Thread 27.0
I'm not starting the thread on this one. Maybe wait another 24-36 hours or so? Thoughts?
heehaw453- Advanced Forecaster
- Posts : 3910
Reputation : 86
Join date : 2014-01-20
Location : Bedminster Township, PA Elevation 600' ASL
Re: Long Range Thread 27.0
Took 110 years to break the record, did it in 2023 with barely anything on the ground--I saw only a whisper of white in New Hope, early one morning a couple of weeks ago...
Am so looking forward to all that's showing up as coming our way this year!
Am so looking forward to all that's showing up as coming our way this year!
kalleg- Posts : 156
Reputation : 2
Join date : 2013-01-15
Location : New Hope, PA
rb924119 likes this post
Re: Long Range Thread 27.0
sroc4 wrote:heehaw453 wrote:rb924119 wrote:Actually, the more I look at this, this looks like it could be more of a 12-18” / 14-20” event for those who are lucky enough to be in the right spot. Why? Well, at cursory glance, if this takes a track like I am expecting, the thermal profile should be PRIME for dendritic growth. Secondly, and this will require deeper digging on my end, but ratios to me look to average anywhere from about 15-20:1 with this storm. So, even though actual liquid equivalency will be between 1-1.5”, you can see how I’m getting the number mathematically. Lastly, this isn’t a classic “roll the system through” setup, meaning it’s not a situation where you have your storm and forcings just move through and it’s over. In this case, the storm is being forced to angle beneath the block. Basically, the mid-level energy and the storm gets squeezed between its normal forward motion and then getting squeezed/shunted southeastward as the block presses. What this does, is it stops the forward progress of the already negatively tilted trough, and then elongates it toward the southeast. As soon as it starts sliding southeast, as long as you’re north of the negatively tilted trough axis, you’re still going to be precipitating with decent forcing even though the surface low will be pulling away. On a radar, this present as a very long trailing comma head. This extended duration will just pile on. This actually is looking more and more like a big-ticket event to me.
I'm in agreement with you Rb. I think this is potentially an 18 hour event for some folks. And some folks could pick up in excess of 1'. This is not a quick hitter scenario and that H pressure being stout and pinned has me very fired up about this potential. The southern origin storms are usually very juicy and once they re-dip their feet in the Atlantic they usually provide very robust qpf.
And not to get too far ahead of ourselves too, but I briefly looked at the upper levels 200-300mb and there is a dual jet structure that could add another hidden element of surprise in the positive direction.
And that HP on the 18z GFS doesnt budge throughout the event. On top of that it also got stronger as the Low heads off the coast. There is def alot to like here, but not ready to sound the alarm bells just yet.
Yeah, I saw that too, and honestly, with how negative the trough is, I think that northern jet should expand further west than your image depicts verbatim
rb924119- Meteorologist
- Posts : 7033
Reputation : 195
Join date : 2013-02-06
Age : 32
Location : Greentown, Pa
Re: Long Range Thread 27.0
We are within 5-6 days I would say a thread as we are tracking a specific system and I would not call this LR per se more like mid-range. But up to you guys. I think it will help when seeing if someone is posting about the possible storm versus LR stuff.heehaw453 wrote:I'm not starting the thread on this one. Maybe wait another 24-36 hours or so? Thoughts?
jmanley32- Senior Enthusiast
- Posts : 20637
Reputation : 108
Join date : 2013-12-12
Age : 43
Location : Yonkers, NY
Re: Long Range Thread 27.0
heehaw453 wrote:I'm not starting the thread on this one. Maybe wait another 24-36 hours or so? Thoughts?
Personally I think we can start one now, as the discussion is biasing toward this threat now, but, I’ll leave the decision up to the powers that be, because I’m fine with either decision haha
rb924119- Meteorologist
- Posts : 7033
Reputation : 195
Join date : 2013-02-06
Age : 32
Location : Greentown, Pa
Re: Long Range Thread 27.0
kalleg wrote:Took 110 years to break the record, did it in 2023 with barely anything on the ground--I saw only a whisper of white in New Hope, early one morning a couple of weeks ago...
Am so looking forward to all that's showing up as coming our way this year!
You know why they keep records, right?
rb924119- Meteorologist
- Posts : 7033
Reputation : 195
Join date : 2013-02-06
Age : 32
Location : Greentown, Pa
Re: Long Range Thread 27.0
Posted earlier today, got lost in the excitement. Are we approaching an astronomical high tide this weekend? Often that enhances these events, correct?
dsix85- Pro Enthusiast
- Posts : 349
Reputation : 8
Join date : 2014-01-01
Location : New York
Re: Long Range Thread 27.0
dsix85 wrote:Posted earlier today, got lost in the excitement. Are we approaching an astronomical high tide this weekend? Often that enhances these events, correct?
Sorry, dsix. It looks like we will be between 3/4 and a new moon, so not great, but at least a new moon is slightly better than a full moon. That said, I don’t expect this to be a big flood threat, as the surface feature will continue progressing, it’s the mid and upper-level features that will lag behind. So the duration of onshore wind will be limited. And with most places, I think snow will be favored over rain. So the flood risk should be pretty minimal to none, unless you’re in a flood prone area of coastal southern New Jersey (if this evolves as I expect).
rb924119- Meteorologist
- Posts : 7033
Reputation : 195
Join date : 2013-02-06
Age : 32
Location : Greentown, Pa
Re: Long Range Thread 27.0
rb924119 wrote:heehaw453 wrote:I'm not starting the thread on this one. Maybe wait another 24-36 hours or so? Thoughts?
Personally I think we can start one now, as the discussion is biasing toward this threat now, but, I’ll leave the decision up to the powers that be, because I’m fine with either decision haha
Not yet. Just wait. If Frank wants to do it then so be it. But I say we take this threat over into the Jan obvs thread starting tomorrow morning, and then discuss anything that goes on from next Monday on here in the LR. Call it superstitious but.....Im superstitious. Giving it a separate thread is like talking about a no hitter in the 7th inning. We all know what's at stake here. lol
_________________
"In weather and in life, there's no winning and losing; there's only winning and learning."
WINTER 2012/2013 TOTALS 43.65"WINTER 2017/2018 TOTALS 62.85" WINTER 2022/2023 TOTALS 4.9"
WINTER 2013/2014 TOTALS 64.85"WINTER 2018/2019 TOTALS 14.25" WINTER 2023/2024 TOTALS 13.1"
WINTER 2014/2015 TOTALS 71.20"WINTER 2019/2020 TOTALS 6.35"
WINTER 2015/2016 TOTALS 35.00"WINTER 2020/2021 TOTALS 37.75"
WINTER 2016/2017 TOTALS 42.25"WINTER 2021/2022 TOTALS 31.65"
sroc4- Admin
- Posts : 8445
Reputation : 302
Join date : 2013-01-07
Location : Wading River, LI
rb924119 and heehaw453 like this post
Re: Long Range Thread 27.0
sroc4 wrote:rb924119 wrote:heehaw453 wrote:I'm not starting the thread on this one. Maybe wait another 24-36 hours or so? Thoughts?
Personally I think we can start one now, as the discussion is biasing toward this threat now, but, I’ll leave the decision up to the powers that be, because I’m fine with either decision haha
Not yet. Just wait. If Frank wants to do it then so be it. But I say we take this threat over into the Jan obvs thread starting tomorrow morning, and then discuss anything that goes on from next Monday on here in the LR. Call it superstitious but.....Im superstitious. Giving it a separate thread is like talking about a no hitter in the 7th inning. We all know what's at stake here. lol
That’s fine - gives us more time to prepare the sacrifice and prayer to the pagan snow gods lmao
rb924119- Meteorologist
- Posts : 7033
Reputation : 195
Join date : 2013-02-06
Age : 32
Location : Greentown, Pa
Grselig likes this post
Re: Long Range Thread 27.0
rb924119 wrote:sroc4 wrote:rb924119 wrote:heehaw453 wrote:I'm not starting the thread on this one. Maybe wait another 24-36 hours or so? Thoughts?
Personally I think we can start one now, as the discussion is biasing toward this threat now, but, I’ll leave the decision up to the powers that be, because I’m fine with either decision haha
Not yet. Just wait. If Frank wants to do it then so be it. But I say we take this threat over into the Jan obvs thread starting tomorrow morning, and then discuss anything that goes on from next Monday on here in the LR. Call it superstitious but.....Im superstitious. Giving it a separate thread is like talking about a no hitter in the 7th inning. We all know what's at stake here. lol
That’s fine - gives us more time to prepare the sacrifice and prayer to the pagan snow gods lmao
LOL And for Janet(Dunnzoo) to get the ice cubes in the back of her toilets....
_________________
"In weather and in life, there's no winning and losing; there's only winning and learning."
WINTER 2012/2013 TOTALS 43.65"WINTER 2017/2018 TOTALS 62.85" WINTER 2022/2023 TOTALS 4.9"
WINTER 2013/2014 TOTALS 64.85"WINTER 2018/2019 TOTALS 14.25" WINTER 2023/2024 TOTALS 13.1"
WINTER 2014/2015 TOTALS 71.20"WINTER 2019/2020 TOTALS 6.35"
WINTER 2015/2016 TOTALS 35.00"WINTER 2020/2021 TOTALS 37.75"
WINTER 2016/2017 TOTALS 42.25"WINTER 2021/2022 TOTALS 31.65"
sroc4- Admin
- Posts : 8445
Reputation : 302
Join date : 2013-01-07
Location : Wading River, LI
Re: Long Range Thread 27.0
LMAO!! I forgot about that hahaha
rb924119- Meteorologist
- Posts : 7033
Reputation : 195
Join date : 2013-02-06
Age : 32
Location : Greentown, Pa
Re: Long Range Thread 27.0
I LOVE this set up for a few reasons. One is that we aren’t talking about a delicate phasing situation here. I also like the concept of a southern storm gaining latitude and running into the confluence in SE Canada. In some cases there is a fear that a southern vort can really juice up especially in an El Niño and bring temp issues but for NOW, the vort strength AND confluence seem to be trending positively in tandem with each other so a stronger storm doesn’t have to mean that, rather it enhances snowfall even more between those two features. Which is where a lot of us live! And the crappy west/pac also limits the northern extent of the southern Low. I’m not thrilled that this has to hold 2 more days to really lock in, but imo these setups are a little more “stable” to track with fewer wide run to run swings. This is ALSO a setup than CAN lead to prolific snow totals. Tons to be excited about but if that 50/50 finds a way to bleed east which we have seen happen (or something g like that) then the setup is changed. As is, a lot more wiggle room than many of our nail-biter, delicate set-ups.
MattyICE- Advanced Forecaster
- Posts : 249
Reputation : 6
Join date : 2017-11-10
Age : 39
Location : Clifton, NJ (Eastern Passaic County)
rb924119 likes this post
rb924119- Meteorologist
- Posts : 7033
Reputation : 195
Join date : 2013-02-06
Age : 32
Location : Greentown, Pa
Re: Long Range Thread 27.0
MattyICE wrote:I LOVE this set up for a few reasons. One is that we aren’t talking about a delicate phasing situation here. I also like the concept of a southern storm gaining latitude and running into the confluence in SE Canada. In some cases there is a fear that a southern vort can really juice up especially in an El Niño and bring temp issues but for NOW, the vort strength AND confluence seem to be trending positively in tandem with each other so a stronger storm doesn’t have to mean that, rather it enhances snowfall even more between those two features. Which is where a lot of us live! And the crappy west/pac also limits the northern extent of the southern Low. I’m not thrilled that this has to hold 2 more days to really lock in, but imo these setups are a little more “stable” to track with fewer wide run to run swings. This is ALSO a setup than CAN lead to prolific snow totals. Tons to be excited about but if that 50/50 finds a way to bleed east which we have seen happen (or something g like that) then the setup is changed. As is, a lot more wiggle room than many of our nail-biter, delicate set-ups.
Again, just like with the December 18th-20th event, the overall progression should slow relative to “averages”, as well as amplify. As you said, there’s a lot of wiggle room with this, but I don’t think we will need it. I think the only way this could really change is for the better. And I think it will.
rb924119- Meteorologist
- Posts : 7033
Reputation : 195
Join date : 2013-02-06
Age : 32
Location : Greentown, Pa
jmanley32 and MattyICE like this post
Re: Long Range Thread 27.0
I’m agreeing with your thoughts. It wouldn’t surprise me in the least with the upper level Jet structure and relatively slow movement of the vortex, that the large scale models are underscoring the precipitation amounts. Once the RGEM and NAM comes into range, details will become much clearer.rb924119 wrote:MattyICE wrote:I LOVE this set up for a few reasons. One is that we aren’t talking about a delicate phasing situation here. I also like the concept of a southern storm gaining latitude and running into the confluence in SE Canada. In some cases there is a fear that a southern vort can really juice up especially in an El Niño and bring temp issues but for NOW, the vort strength AND confluence seem to be trending positively in tandem with each other so a stronger storm doesn’t have to mean that, rather it enhances snowfall even more between those two features. Which is where a lot of us live! And the crappy west/pac also limits the northern extent of the southern Low. I’m not thrilled that this has to hold 2 more days to really lock in, but imo these setups are a little more “stable” to track with fewer wide run to run swings. This is ALSO a setup than CAN lead to prolific snow totals. Tons to be excited about but if that 50/50 finds a way to bleed east which we have seen happen (or something g like that) then the setup is changed. As is, a lot more wiggle room than many of our nail-biter, delicate set-ups.
Again, just like with the December 18th-20th event, the overall progression should slow relative to “averages”, as well as amplify. As you said, there’s a lot of wiggle room with this, but I don’t think we will need it. I think the only way this could really change is for the better. And I think it will.
nutleyblizzard- Senior Enthusiast
- Posts : 1963
Reputation : 41
Join date : 2014-01-30
Age : 58
Location : Nutley, new jersey
rb924119 likes this post
Re: Long Range Thread 27.0
I am fully expecting the NAM at least specifically 3km to show some rediculous amounts, fun to look at the the Hi-res nam is not usually correct. Remember that time it showed 77 inches in MA lol.nutleyblizzard wrote:I’m agreeing with your thoughts. It wouldn’t surprise me in the least with the upper level Jet structure and relatively slow movement of the vortex, that the large scale models are underscoring the precipitation amounts. Once the RGEM and NAM comes into range, details will become much clearer.rb924119 wrote:MattyICE wrote:I LOVE this set up for a few reasons. One is that we aren’t talking about a delicate phasing situation here. I also like the concept of a southern storm gaining latitude and running into the confluence in SE Canada. In some cases there is a fear that a southern vort can really juice up especially in an El Niño and bring temp issues but for NOW, the vort strength AND confluence seem to be trending positively in tandem with each other so a stronger storm doesn’t have to mean that, rather it enhances snowfall even more between those two features. Which is where a lot of us live! And the crappy west/pac also limits the northern extent of the southern Low. I’m not thrilled that this has to hold 2 more days to really lock in, but imo these setups are a little more “stable” to track with fewer wide run to run swings. This is ALSO a setup than CAN lead to prolific snow totals. Tons to be excited about but if that 50/50 finds a way to bleed east which we have seen happen (or something g like that) then the setup is changed. As is, a lot more wiggle room than many of our nail-biter, delicate set-ups.
Again, just like with the December 18th-20th event, the overall progression should slow relative to “averages”, as well as amplify. As you said, there’s a lot of wiggle room with this, but I don’t think we will need it. I think the only way this could really change is for the better. And I think it will.
jmanley32- Senior Enthusiast
- Posts : 20637
Reputation : 108
Join date : 2013-12-12
Age : 43
Location : Yonkers, NY
Re: Long Range Thread 27.0
https://www.nj.com/weather/2024/01/nj-weather-forecasters-tracking-possible-1st-significant-snowfall-in-2-years-this-weekend.html
Irish- Pro Enthusiast
- Posts : 788
Reputation : 19
Join date : 2019-01-16
Age : 46
Location : Old Bridge, NJ
Re: Long Range Thread 27.0
_________________
Mugs
AKA:King: Snow Weenie
Self Proclaimed
WINTER 2014-15 : 55.12" +.02 for 6 coatings (avg. 35")
WINTER 2015-16 Total - 29.8" (Avg 35")
WINTER 2016-17 : 39.5" so far
amugs- Advanced Forecaster - Mod
- Posts : 15130
Reputation : 213
Join date : 2013-01-07
Age : 54
Location : Hillsdale,NJ
sroc4, rb924119, heehaw453 and Irish like this post
Re: Long Range Thread 27.0
_________________
Mugs
AKA:King: Snow Weenie
Self Proclaimed
WINTER 2014-15 : 55.12" +.02 for 6 coatings (avg. 35")
WINTER 2015-16 Total - 29.8" (Avg 35")
WINTER 2016-17 : 39.5" so far
amugs- Advanced Forecaster - Mod
- Posts : 15130
Reputation : 213
Join date : 2013-01-07
Age : 54
Location : Hillsdale,NJ
Re: Long Range Thread 27.0
YES SIR MUGSY!!! 1050+hPa pressure in the northern Plains, that’s crème de le crème cold air baby. Give me a building snowpack and we may as well be in the Arctic
rb924119- Meteorologist
- Posts : 7033
Reputation : 195
Join date : 2013-02-06
Age : 32
Location : Greentown, Pa
Page 25 of 40 • 1 ... 14 ... 24, 25, 26 ... 32 ... 40
Page 25 of 40
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum